From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Millan-Colon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 26, 2014
152 So. 3d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2D13–1823.

11-26-2014

Luis MILLAN–COLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gregory v. State, 937 So.2d 180, 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“[T]he defendant waived this issue, because he did not request the instruction and assented to the court's decision to list trespass and battery separately on the verdict form. We have held that this is not fundamental error.”); see also Daniel v. State, 137 So.3d 1181, 1185 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (holding that failure to instruct on trespass as a lesser-included offense three steps removed from armed burglary of a dwelling was harmless because the jury did not exercise its pardon power by finding defendant guilty of any of the lesser-included offenses one and two steps removed).

DAVIS, C.J., and LaROSE and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Millan-Colon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 26, 2014
152 So. 3d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Millan-Colon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Luis MILLAN–COLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

Citations

152 So. 3d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)