From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miles v. Garland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 23, 2021
No. 2:19-CV-01881-MCE-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2021)

Opinion

No. 2:19-CV-01881-MCE-CKD P

02-23-2021

MAURICE MILES, SR. Plaintiff, v. DANIEL GARLAND, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed January 13, 2021, plaintiff's third amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a fourth amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: February 23, 2021

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12/mile1881.fta(4).docx


Summaries of

Miles v. Garland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 23, 2021
No. 2:19-CV-01881-MCE-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Miles v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE MILES, SR. Plaintiff, v. DANIEL GARLAND, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 23, 2021

Citations

No. 2:19-CV-01881-MCE-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2021)