From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mike v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 15, 2016
198 So. 3d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D14–4538.

04-15-2016

Deanthony E. MIKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Deanthony E. Mike appeals his judgments and sentences for attempted second-degree murder, aggravated assault with a firearm, and discharging a firearm from a vehicle. We are required to reverse because the trial court committed fundamental error in instructing the jury on attempted manslaughter.

We do not address the other issues Mr. Mike raises as it is unnecessary to the resolution of this appeal.


“[A] trial court commits fundamental error in giving the standard jury instruction on attempted manslaughter by act where the defendant is convicted of a crime no more than one step removed from the improperly instructed offense.” Williams v. State, 123 So.3d 23, 27 (Fla.2013). Mr. Mike was convicted of attempted second-degree murder, a crime one step removed from attempted manslaughter. The trial court's instruction to the jury on attempted manslaughter told the jury that the State had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Mike “committed an act which was intended to cause the death of” Mr. Smith. In Williams, 123 So.3d at 25, the supreme court held that this instruction was fundamental error. See also Griffin v. State, 160 So.3d 63 (Fla.2015) ; Hill v. State, 124 So.3d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Accordingly, Mr. Mike's judgment and sentence for second-degree murder is reversed and remanded for a new trial. His judgments and sentences for aggravated assault with a firearm and discharging a firearm from a vehicle are affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LaROSE and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Mike v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 15, 2016
198 So. 3d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Mike v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEANTHONY E. MIKE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 15, 2016

Citations

198 So. 3d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)