From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miess v. Walkowiak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 23, 1967
27 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

February 23, 1967

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Bastow, J.P., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: There is insufficient support in the record for the order made three years after the accident and 18 months after plaintiff's original bill had been served. "A motion for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars must be supported by an affidavit of a person with knowledge of the facts" (6 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 36:67; Montondo v. Petty, 21 A.D.2d 975). The hearsay affidavit of plaintiff's attorney and the minutes of her examination before trial fail to show that the new particulars were unknown when the original bill was served and show no facts excusing her delay in seeking the relief.


Summaries of

Miess v. Walkowiak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 23, 1967
27 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Miess v. Walkowiak

Case Details

Full title:PAUL T. MIESS et al., Respondents, v. ROBERT WALKOWIAK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Shea v. Pellicano

( Symphonic Electronic Corp. v. Audio Devices, 24 A.D.2d 746.) Here there was no showing of such unusual and…

McLeod v. Duffy

No excuse is given in plaintiffs' or their counsel's affidavits other than law office failure. The delay is…