From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mielke v. Mich Millers Mutual

Michigan Court of Appeals
Apr 18, 1978
82 Mich. App. 721 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

Docket No. 30914.

Decided April 18, 1978. Leave to appeal applied for.

Keller, Keller, Creager, Kosick Rochau, for plaintiff.

Butzbaugh, Page, Butzbaugh Dewane, for defendant.

Before: M.F. CAVANAGH, P.J., and BRONSON and M.J. KELLY, JJ.


Defendant appeals as of right from an order granting plaintiff's summary judgment motion on the basis that the governmental benefits set-off provision of Michigan's no-fault insurance act, MCLA 500.3109(1); MSA 24.13109(1), is unconstitutional. Defendant, plaintiff's insurer, reduced payments due plaintiff by the amount of Social Security survivor's benefits received by plaintiff.

This case is controlled by Pollock v Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Co, 79 Mich. App. 218; 261 N.W.2d 554 (1977). Pollock involved a set-off for workmen's compensation benefits. Its reasoning is equally applicable to a set-off for Social Security benefits.

We also note that Richardson v Belcher, 404 U.S. 78; 92 S Ct 254; 30 L Ed 2d 231 (1971), is inapposite, as that case found a rational basis for a Federal set-off statute in the need to preserve state workmen's compensation programs, a consideration not applicable to the case at bar.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.


Summaries of

Mielke v. Mich Millers Mutual

Michigan Court of Appeals
Apr 18, 1978
82 Mich. App. 721 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Mielke v. Mich Millers Mutual

Case Details

Full title:MIELKE v MICHIGAN MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 18, 1978

Citations

82 Mich. App. 721 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978)
267 N.W.2d 165

Citing Cases

Smith v. Daiie

A constitutional challenge to the statute's application in the context of the receipt of duplicative workers'…

O'Donnell v. State Farm Ins. Co.

majority of those cases considering the constitutionality of this scheme.Greene v State Farm Mutual…