From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Midland Properties Company v. Kennedy

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 24, 1959
110 S.E.2d 120 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959)

Opinion

37664, 37665, 37666, 37667.

DECIDED JUNE 24, 1959. REHEARING DENIED JULY 17, 1959.

Action for damages. Savannah City Court. Before Judge Alexander. February 10, 1959.

Hitch, Miller Beckmann, Robert M. Hitch, John E. Simpson, for Midland Properties Co. and Savannah Atlanta Ry. Co.

Oliver, Davis Maner, Edwin Maner, Jr., for Mayor c. of Savannah.

Bouhan, Lawrence, Williams, Levy McAlpin, for Savannah Electric c. Co.

Allyn M. Wallace, Aaron Kravitch, Phyllis Kravitch, contra.


The petition set forth a cause of action against each defendant, and no error harmful to any of the defendants was shown by the special demurrers.

DECIDED JUNE 24, 1959 — REHEARING DENIED JULY 17, 1959.


Mrs. Betty Lasley Kennedy, as the widow of Walter Aaron Kennedy, sued Midland Properties Company, Savannah Atlanta Railway Company, Savannah Electric Power Company and the Mayor Aldermen of the City of Savannah to recover because of the death of her husband who was allegedly instantly electrocuted in the same tragic incident as that shown in the petition of James David Farmer, which petition is fully set forth in Midland Properties Co. v. Farmer, ante. The separate demurrers of each defendant to the petition as amended were overruled, and each defendant in a separate writ of error assigns error on the judgment adverse to it.


1. All but one question presented in the writs of error in the cases sub judice are controlled adversely to the defendants by the decision in Midland Properties Co. v. Farmer, ante, and only this one question which is not so controlled will be dealt with hereinafter.

2. The defendant Savannah Electric Power Company demurred to a part of paragraph 1 of count 3 of the petition. This paragraph of count 3 adopted various paragraphs of count 1 by express reference and included therein were paragraphs "60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 and 66." The demurrer was to the part adopting paragraphs 60 through 66 because count 1 did not contain any such numbered paragraphs.

Not only error but hurt must be shown in order to obtain a reversal of the judgment of the trial court ( Gulick v. Mulcahy, 95 Ga. App. 158, 160, 97 S.E.2d 362), and, "Ordinarily error is presumed hurtful unless it appears to have had no effect upon the result of the trial." Rogers v. Johnson, 94 Ga. App. 666, 682 ( 96 S.E.2d 285).

While this obvious typographical error should have been corrected by the plaintiff when it was called to her attention, it is just as obvious that the reference to the nonexisting paragraphs of count 1 could not have harmed the defendant Savannah Electric Power Company since it could have no effect upon the result of the case. Therefore, the judgment overruling such demurrer can not be reversed. However, since this reference to the nonexisting paragraphs should be stricken from count 3 of the petition direction to do so is hereby given.

Judgment affirmed with direction. Gardner, P. J., Townsend, Carlisle and Quillian, JJ., concur. Felton, C. J., dissents.


See dissenting opinion in Midland Properties Co. v. Farmer, ante.


Summaries of

Midland Properties Company v. Kennedy

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 24, 1959
110 S.E.2d 120 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959)
Case details for

Midland Properties Company v. Kennedy

Case Details

Full title:MIDLAND PROPERTIES COMPANY v. KENNEDY. SAVANNAH ATLANTA RAILWAY COMPANY v…

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 24, 1959

Citations

110 S.E.2d 120 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959)
110 S.E.2d 120

Citing Cases

Glynn County v. Victor

A harmless error does not require reversal. Midland Properties Co. v. Kennedy, 100 Ga. App. 37, 38 ( 110…

Gamble v. State

See Roberts v. State, 65 Ga. 430 (2) (431, reprint); Brown v. State, 141 Ga. 5, 6 (4) ( 80 S.E. 320). Here no…