From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Township of Middletown v. Middletown PBA Local 124

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 11, 2000
764 A.2d 940 (N.J. 2000)

Opinion

A-57 September Term 1999

Argued September 11, 2000

Decided October 11, 2000

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 334 N.J. Super. 512, 760 A.2d 326 (1999).

CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO and ZAZZALI join in this opinion. JUSTICE LAVECCHIA would have dismissed the petition for certification as improvidently granted.

Bernard M. Reilly argued the cause for appellant (Dowd Reilly, attorneys).

Fred M. Klatsky argued the cause for respondent (Klatsky Klatsky, attorneys; Michael A. Bukosky, on the brief).

Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission.


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 334 N.J. Super. 512, 760 A.2d 326 (1999).

For dismissal as improvidently granted-Justice LaVECCHIA-1.


Summaries of

Township of Middletown v. Middletown PBA Local 124

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 11, 2000
764 A.2d 940 (N.J. 2000)
Case details for

Township of Middletown v. Middletown PBA Local 124

Case Details

Full title:TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN, Respondent-Appellant, v. MIDDLETOWN PBA LOCAL 124…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 11, 2000

Citations

764 A.2d 940 (N.J. 2000)
764 A.2d 940

Citing Cases

Cnty. of Atl. v. PBA Lodge 34 (In re Twp. of Bridgewater)

It might well have required careful consideration of past practices, custom and the viability of the dynamic…