From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Midalgo v. McLaughlin

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 30, 2009
9:06-CV-330 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)

Opinion

9:06-CV-330.

March 30, 2009

GABRIEL MIDALGO, 97-A-7235, Plaintiff, pro se, Southport Correctional Facility, Pine City, New York.

HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General for the State of New York, Attorney for Defendants, ADELE M. TAYLOR SCOTT, ESQ., Ass't Attorney General, Albany, NY.


DECISION and ORDER


Plaintiff brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 6, 2009, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation, that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute and provide a current address. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Midalgo v. McLaughlin

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 30, 2009
9:06-CV-330 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Midalgo v. McLaughlin

Case Details

Full title:GABRIEL MIDALGO Plaintiff, v. McLAUGHLIN, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

Citations

9:06-CV-330 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wallace v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.

As a result, the defendant is entitled to the plaintiff's medical information. See Hitzig v. Hubbard, No.…

Stogner v. Sturdivant

Defendants assert that Mrs. Stogner's medical records became even more relevant when she testified at her…