From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mid Continent Cas. Co. v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Oct 1, 2012
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00128-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 1, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00128-MP-GRJ

10-01-2012

MID CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. L B KING, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 193, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that the motions for summary judgment by each side be denied and this matter be set for bench trial. Both sides filed objections and responses, Docs. 196-99, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection was made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon consideration, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 193, is accepted and incorporated herein.
2. This matter shall be set for pretrial conference before the undersigned by separate notice, and the schedule for filing pretrial materials such as stipulations and proposed findings shall be set by separate notice.

_________________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Mid Continent Cas. Co. v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Oct 1, 2012
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00128-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Mid Continent Cas. Co. v. King

Case Details

Full title:MID CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. L B KING, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 1, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00128-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 1, 2012)

Citing Cases

Jeffrey v. Allstate Indem. Co.

It is axiomatic that an insurer can argue that a loss is not within the scope of coverage because it does not…