From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mid-America Pipeline v. Fed. Power Comm

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jan 26, 1962
299 F.2d 126 (D.C. Cir. 1962)

Opinion

No. 16694.

January 26, 1962.

William W. Ross and J. David Mann, Jr., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Solicitor, Federal Power Commission, for respondent.

Justin R. Wolf and Charles A. Case, Jr., Washington, D.C., for intervenor.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, and BAZELON and FAHY, Circuit Judges, in Chambers.


Upon consideration of respondent's motion to dismiss, of intervenor's memorandum in support, of petitioner's response and of respondent's reply, and it appearing that the issues petitioner attempts to raise in this petition for review may be raised in any review of the final order of the Commission in these proceedings, it is

ORDERED by the Court that this petition for review be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, would deny the motion to dismiss without prejudice to its renewal at the hearing of this case on the merits.


Summaries of

Mid-America Pipeline v. Fed. Power Comm

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jan 26, 1962
299 F.2d 126 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Case details for

Mid-America Pipeline v. Fed. Power Comm

Case Details

Full title:MID-AMERICA PIPELINE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jan 26, 1962

Citations

299 F.2d 126 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
112 U.S. App. D.C. 42

Citing Cases

Greene County Planning Bd. v. Fed. Power Com'n

But the courts, sensitive to the policies underlying the requirement of exhaustion of administrative…