From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. ION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 25, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1935 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Jul. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Civ. No. 05-1935 (JNE/SRN).

July 25, 2006


ORDER


This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge, on June 15, 2006. Ion Technologies Corporation, The World Online Communications Corporation, and Paul Martin objected to the Report and Recommendation, and Microsoft Corporation responded. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Jury Demand of Defendants [Docket No. 102] is DENIED.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss the Abuse of Process Counterclaim (Count I) of Defendants [Docket No. 107] is GRANTED.
3. Counter-Defendants Randy Bradley and Bradley, Andrew, Christopher Kaye's Motion to Dismiss the Conversion (Count II) and Civil Conspiracy (Count III) Counterclaims [Docket No. 111] is DENIED.
4. Count I of Defendants' Counterclaims [Docket No. 95] is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. ION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 25, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1935 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Jul. 25, 2006)
Case details for

MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. ION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:Microsoft Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Ion Technologies Corporation, The…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jul 25, 2006

Citations

Civ. No. 05-1935 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Jul. 25, 2006)

Citing Cases

Peterson v. Wash. Cnty.

(1) whether the case involves issues which are best tried to a jury; (2) whether granting the motion would…