From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michigan v. Caruso

U.S.
Jan 17, 1995
513 U.S. 1121 (1995)

Summary

noting that "courts applying the FSIA have uniformly rejected the argument that a personal injury suffered overseas produces a direct effect in the United States when the injured person later returns home."

Summary of this case from Jerez v. Republic of Cuba

Opinion

No. 94-932.

January 17, 1995.


Sup. Ct. Mich. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 446 Mich. 643, 521 N. W. 2d 557.


Summaries of

Michigan v. Caruso

U.S.
Jan 17, 1995
513 U.S. 1121 (1995)

noting that "courts applying the FSIA have uniformly rejected the argument that a personal injury suffered overseas produces a direct effect in the United States when the injured person later returns home."

Summary of this case from Jerez v. Republic of Cuba
Case details for

Michigan v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:MICHIGAN v. CARUSO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 17, 1995

Citations

513 U.S. 1121 (1995)

Citing Cases

The Parish of the Advent v. the P.E. Diocese of Mass

In Fortin, supra at 786-787, we noted that a church structure could be either hierarchical or congregational,…

Wooten v. Crayton

If, on the other hand, the religious organization in question was congregational, the courts would go farther…