holding that plaintiff who lost her individual claim of discrimination could not be a class representative even if she may have appeared adequate prior to trial
Summary of this case from Merrill v. S. Methodist Univ.No. 83-268.
October 11, 1983, OCTOBER TERM, 1983.
C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 702 F. 2d 1207.
holding that plaintiff who lost her individual claim of discrimination could not be a class representative even if she may have appeared adequate prior to trial
Summary of this case from Merrill v. S. Methodist Univ.disapproving use of a declaratory judgment as a tool to collaterally attack a final divorce decree.
Summary of this case from Huggins v. PierceFull title:MICHELIN TIRE CORP., COMMERCIAL DIVISION v. BOSTICK OIL CO., INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 11, 1983
Martin Motor Sales, Inc. v. Saab-Scania of America, Inc., 452 F. Supp. 1047, 1052 (S.D.N.Y. 1978), aff'd, 595…
Keys Jeep Eagle, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.In order for CCC to be liable under the Act, Florida Keys Jeep must prove that CCC is an agent of the…