From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michaels v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 1, 2015
NO. CV 14-8531-DDP(E) (C.D. Cal. May. 1, 2015)

Opinion

NO. CV 14-8531-DDP(E)

05-01-2015

COREY MICHAELS, Petitioner, v. JACK FOX, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: May 1, 2015

/s/_________

DEAN D. PREGERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Michaels v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 1, 2015
NO. CV 14-8531-DDP(E) (C.D. Cal. May. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Michaels v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:COREY MICHAELS, Petitioner, v. JACK FOX, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 1, 2015

Citations

NO. CV 14-8531-DDP(E) (C.D. Cal. May. 1, 2015)

Citing Cases

Warner Bros. Co. v. Israel

The defendant not only denies its liability for the remainder of the purchase price on the ground that the…