From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MEZA v. N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 15, 2008
50 A.D.3d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3377.

April 15, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about June 12, 2007, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York (Jillian Rosen of counsel), for appellant.

London Fischer, LLP, New York (Brian A. Kalman of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.


Defendants had no obligation to maintain a constantly dry floor during a snowstorm ( see Solazzo v New York City Tr. Auth., 21 AD3d 735). Nor were they required to cover the entire floor with mats ( Garcia v Delgado Travel Agency, 4 AD3d 204).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

MEZA v. N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 15, 2008
50 A.D.3d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

MEZA v. N.Y

Case Details

Full title:EDELMIRA MEZA, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 15, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3324
854 N.Y.S.2d 646

Citing Cases

Santiago v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.

was being tracked into the lobby does not constitute notice of a dangerous condition”] ). Further—and,…