From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyercord Co. v. Gwilliam Mfg. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 27, 1925
85 Pa. Super. 38 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1925)

Opinion

November 13, 1924.

February 27, 1925.

Appeal, No. 234, Oct. T., 1924, by defendant, from judgment of Municipal Court of Philadelphia, March T., 1924, No. 1420, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in the case of The Meyercord Company v. The Gwilliam Manufacturing Company, a corporation.

Before ORLADY, P.J., PORTER, HENDERSON, TREXLER, KELLER, LINN and GAWTHROP, JJ. Affirmed.

Assumpsit on written contract. Before BROWN, J.

Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

The court made absolute the rule. Defendant appealed.

Error assigned was the decree of the court.

Harry M. Miller, for appellant.

James Yearsley, and with him Illoway Felix, for appellee.


Argued November 13, 1924.


This case was argued with the appeal of the plaintiff in The Meyercord Co. v. The Gwilliam Manufacturing Co., to No. 200, October Term, 1924. In that case the question involved was whether it was error to refuse to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. In this, in which the controlling facts do not differ from the facts in the former case, the court below entered judgment for the plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. For the reasons stated in an opinion this day filed in the former case, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Meyercord Co. v. Gwilliam Mfg. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 27, 1925
85 Pa. Super. 38 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1925)
Case details for

Meyercord Co. v. Gwilliam Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Meyercord Company v. Gwilliam Manufacturing Company, Appellant (No. 2)

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 27, 1925

Citations

85 Pa. Super. 38 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1925)

Citing Cases

Yancye v. Gen. Finance Co.

David S. Malis, for appellant. — Plaintiff failed to prove a breach of a lease: Bowersox v. Weigle Myers, 77…