From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metzger v. Metzger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1994
206 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Summary

In Metzger v Metzger (206 AD2d 352 [2d Dept 1994]), the trial court found the defendant in contempt for failing to provide life insurance, pursuant to a court order.

Summary of this case from In re Lanaya

Opinion

July 5, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court properly found the appellant in contempt. The court was not required to conduct a hearing on the plaintiff former husband's application, as the appellant did not dispute his factual allegations (see, Bowie v. Bowie, 182 A.D.2d 1049). We have considered the appellant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. We note, however, that she has commenced a plenary action to set aside the parties' separation agreement, on the ground that she was coerced into signing it. That issue is not presently before this Court and, thus, we take no position on it. Rosenblatt, J.P., Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Metzger v. Metzger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1994
206 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

In Metzger v Metzger (206 AD2d 352 [2d Dept 1994]), the trial court found the defendant in contempt for failing to provide life insurance, pursuant to a court order.

Summary of this case from In re Lanaya
Case details for

Metzger v. Metzger

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. METZGER, Respondent, v. LINDA M. METZGER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 326

Citing Cases

Cassarino v. Cassarino

"Once the movant establishes a knowing failure to comply with a clear and unequivocal mandate, the burden…

Sutton v. Sutton

The defendant tendered proof demonstrating that the plaintiff was named a “beneficiary” on the defendant's…