From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Messer v. Curci

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 19, 1990
908 F.2d 103 (6th Cir. 1990)

Opinion

No. 85-5626.

July 19, 1990.

Deborah G. Roher, Stephen Krumm, Northeast Kentucky Legal Services, Ashland, Ky., for plaintiffs-appellants.

J. Patrick Abell, Dept. of Parks, Paul C. Gaines, III, Daniel F. Egbers, Com. of Ky., Dept. of Personnel, J. Michael Noyes, Frankfort, Ky., for defendants-appellees.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon remand from the United States Supreme Court, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 3233, 111 L.Ed.2d 745, which vacated the judgment of this court and having considered the appellants' motion for reversal of the district court without briefing or argument in light of the Supreme Court's action.

It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court, 610 F. Supp. 179, is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 496 U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 2729, 111 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990).


Summaries of

Messer v. Curci

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 19, 1990
908 F.2d 103 (6th Cir. 1990)
Case details for

Messer v. Curci

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE MESSER AND TIMOTHY P'SIMER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FRAN CURCI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jul 19, 1990

Citations

908 F.2d 103 (6th Cir. 1990)

Citing Cases

Glazer v. Whirlpool Corp. (In re Whirlpool Corp.)

In Messer v. Curci, 881 F.2d 219, 220 (6th Cir.1989) (en banc), this court held that an “allegation of…