From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merritt v. Park

U.S.
Mar 19, 1883
108 U.S. 109 (1883)

Opinion

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Decided March 19th, 1883.

Customs Duties. The decision of this court, in Schmidt v. Badger, 107 U.S. 85, that, under the statutory provisions in question in this case, the proper duty on the importation of glass bottles containing beer, was a duty of 30 per cent. ad valorem on the bottles, in addition to a specific duty of 35 cents a gallon on the beer, confirmed and applied to this case.

Mr. Solicitor-General Phillips for collector. Mr. Edward Hartley and Mr. Walter H. Coleman for appellees.


The facts are all in the opinion.


This is a suit to recover back duties exacted by the plaintiff in error, as collector of the port of New York, on glass bottles imported in March, 1879, from London. The bottles contained beer, and the defendant below exacted a specific duty of 35 cents a gallon on the beer, and also a duty of 30 per cent. ad valorem on the bottles. The bottles were the ordinary ale bottles of commerce. The circuit court directed a verdict for the plaintiffs, and they had a judgment, to review which the collector brought this writ of error.

The question involved is the same, and arose under the same statutory provisions, as in the case of Schmidt v. Badger, 107 U.S. 85. It was there held that such duty on the bottles, in addition to such duty on the beer and ale contained in them, was a lawful duty. That decision governs the present case, and the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the case is remanded to that court, with directions to grant a new trial.


Summaries of

Merritt v. Park

U.S.
Mar 19, 1883
108 U.S. 109 (1883)
Case details for

Merritt v. Park

Case Details

Full title:MERRITT, Collector, v . PARK Another

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 19, 1883

Citations

108 U.S. 109 (1883)

Citing Cases

Ferguson v. Arthur

ed.), "Henry's Calcined Magnesia," imported in glass bottles, is liable to a duty of 50 per cent. ad…

Aikens v. Wisconsin

1 Chitty Cr. Law, 1138; Quinn v. Leathem, [1901] A.C. 495; Jones v. Randall, Lofft's Rep. 383; Read v.…