From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merrill v. Austin

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1879
53 Cal. 379 (Cal. 1879)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco.

         Action to recover back a tax on personal property, levied for the fiscal year 1872-3. The payment was made January 2nd, 1873, and before the tax was returned as delinquent. The plaintiffs had judgment, and the defendant appealed. (See Wills v. Austin, ante, p. 152.)

         COUNSEL:

         W. C. Burnett, City and County Attorney, for Appellant.

          Geo. B. Merrill, for Respondents.


         OPINION

         THE COURT

         The payment under protest was made on the 2nd day of January, 1873, and before the tax (which was on personal property alone) was returned delinquent. Until the tax became delinquent, the plaintiff was not under such legal coercion as compelled the payment in order to save the collection of the amount by sale of his real property or otherwise. The payment was a voluntary payment, because the defendant was not then in a position to enforce the collection by a sale of plaintiff's property. (Williams v. Corcoran , 46 Cal. 556; Bank of Woodland v. Webber , 52 Cal. 73, and other cases.)

         Judgment and order reversed, as of the day of the submission of the cause. Remittitur forthwith.


Summaries of

Merrill v. Austin

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1879
53 Cal. 379 (Cal. 1879)
Case details for

Merrill v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:J. C. MERRILL, LESLIE C. HANKS, and CHAS. R. MERRILL v. ALEX. AUSTIN, Tax…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1879

Citations

53 Cal. 379 (Cal. 1879)

Citing Cases

Southern Service Co., Ltd., v. Los Angeles

On the other hand it has also been held that the filing of a protest with a payment of illegal taxes…

Hamilton v. County of San Diego

The taxpayers cannot recover back money voluntarily paid for taxes. (Dear v. Varnum , 80 Cal. 89; Cooper v.…