From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merlan Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 2, 2001
800 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-3614.

November 2, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Richard A. Luce, Judge.


Merlan Davis appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Davis's direct appeal is currently pending. Thus, the trial court was without jurisdiction to rule on Davis's motion to correct illegal sentence. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800 (a). A prematurely filed motion to correct illegal sentence should be dismissed by a trial court and may be refiled after the direct appeal is final. Phillibert v. State, 768 So.2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). In the alternative, a trial court may stay the motion pending the resolution of the direct appeal. Id. Accordingly, we vacate the order of the trial court and remand with instructions either to dismiss Davis's 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to his right to refile after his direct appeal is final or to stay the motion pending the outcome of the direct appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Merlan Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 2, 2001
800 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Merlan Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:MERLAN DAVIS, v. Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 2, 2001

Citations

800 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Davis v. State

On appeal from an order denying his motion, we reversed and remanded. See Davis v. State, 800 So.2d 656 (Fla.…