From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meribear Prods., Inc. v. Frank

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 21, 2016
322 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

06-21-2016

MERIBEAR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. Joan E. FRANK et al.

Michael S. Taylor, Hartford, and Matthew C. Eagan, in support of the petition. Anthony J. LaBella, Fairfield, in opposition.


Michael S. Taylor, Hartford, and Matthew C. Eagan, in support of the petition.

Anthony J. LaBella, Fairfield, in opposition.

Opinion

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 165 Conn.App. 305, 140 A.3d 993 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the trial court properly determined that: (1) the foreign judgment against George A. Frank was enforceable after concluding that he had minimum contacts with California that warranted the exercise of its jurisdiction; (2) the contract signed by Joan E. Frank was enforceable notwithstanding the provisions of the Home Solicitation Sales Act; and (3) an award of double damages to the plaintiff was appropriate.”

ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Meribear Prods., Inc. v. Frank

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 21, 2016
322 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

Meribear Prods., Inc. v. Frank

Case Details

Full title:MERIBEAR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. Joan E. FRANK et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 21, 2016

Citations

322 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2016)
138 A.3d 288

Citing Cases

Meribear Prods. v. Frank

This court granted the defendants’ joint petition for certification to appeal. See Meribear Productions, Inc.…

Meribear Prods., Inc. v. Frank

This court granted certification, limited to the following issues: "Did the Appellate Court correctly…