From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mercury Capital Corp. v. McGeean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 1994
205 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 13, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that, as a matter of law, the subject loan qualifies as a "federally related mortgage loan", such that State usury laws do not apply (see, 12 U.S.C. § 1735f-7a, 1735f-5 [b]; Banking Law § 14-a). Because the appellants do not dispute allegations that they defaulted on the loan, the plaintiff is entitled to foreclose on the mortgage.

We have considered the appellants' remaining contentions, and find them to be without merit. Ritter, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mercury Capital Corp. v. McGeean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 1994
205 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Mercury Capital Corp. v. McGeean

Case Details

Full title:MERCURY CAPITAL CORP., Respondent, v. CHARLES A. McGEEAN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 292

Citing Cases

Wasserman v. Harriman

In addition, Harriman's claims of usury are without merit. Inasmuch as the subject mortgage loan qualifies…