finding justifiable reliance not alleged as a matter of law where plaintiffs did not "allege that they were told not to read or to otherwise ignore the disclaimers" warning them not to rely on allegedly misleading statements
Summary of this case from Ketayi v. Health Enrollment Grp.89-56011, 89-56012.
August 24, 1992.
C.D.Cal.
AFFIRMED IN PART, RE-VERSED IN PART
finding justifiable reliance not alleged as a matter of law where plaintiffs did not "allege that they were told not to read or to otherwise ignore the disclaimers" warning them not to rely on allegedly misleading statements
Summary of this case from Ketayi v. Health Enrollment Grp.In Jackson, the prisoner repeatedly refused to relinquish a foil coffee packet to prison officials, which necessitated the assembly of a "cell extraction team" to take it from him.
Summary of this case from Washington v. BarryFull title:Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. v. Hartford Acc. Indem. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Aug 24, 1992
LaShpella v. C.E.R.T. Team, 989 F.2d 505 (Table, Unpub. Dispo.), 1993 WL 87000 (8th Cir.); Bennett v. Cambra,…
Schiappa v. Charityusa.Com, LLC"If the use of a mark serves only a functional purpose, there is not a likelihood of confusion." Greater…