Opinion
Argued November 22, 1954.
January 6, 1955.
Appeals — Final or interlocutory orders — Order refusing to dissolve preliminary injunction.
An order refusing to dissolve a preliminary injunction and permitting plaintiff to file a bond nunc pro tunc is interlocutory only and not appealable.
Before STERN, C. J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.
Appeal, No. 216, Jan. T., 1954, from order of Court of Common Pleas No. 2 of Philadelphia County, March T., 1943, No. 1833, in case of Katherine M. Meng v. Frederick William Meng, also known as Frederick W. Meng. Appeal quashed.
Proceeding in equity.
Order entered refusing to dissolve preliminary injunction and allowing plaintiff to file bond nunc pro tunc, opinion by CARROLL, J. Defendant appealed.
William, N.J. McGinniss, for appellant.
Hyman A. Guth, with him Fred C. Gartner, for appellee.
The order of the Court below refusing to dissolve the preliminary injunction and permitting the appellee to file a bond nunc pro tunc, being interlocutory only and therefore not appealable, the appeal is quashed.