From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mena v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1997
243 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 14, 1997

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.


The testimony of the charging officer, as well as the written misbehavior report, constituted substantial evidence of the petitioner's misconduct ( Matter of Perez v. Wilmot, 67 N.Y.2d 615; Matter of Duso v. Kralik, 216 A.D.2d 297).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

Ritter, J.P., Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mena v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1997
243 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Mena v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LUIS MENA, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as Commissioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 14, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 292