From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melnick v. Khoroushi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 30, 2008
57 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

December 30, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered June 18, 2008, which denied plaintiff's' motion to vacate a default judgment that had affirmed an arbitration award directing plaintiff's to refund $12,000 in legal fees to defendants, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Sanction for frivolous prosecution of this appeal ( 22 NYCRR 130-1.1) imposed on plaintiff's for $3,500. The Clerk of Supreme Court, New York County directed to enter judgment payable in that amount to Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection, and the matter remanded for determination of reasonable attorney fees incurred in responding to this appeal, to be payable by plaintiff's to defendants Khoroushi and Alpine Armoring.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Nardelli, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.


A default is considered intentional when a party takes no steps to vacate it until after judgment has been entered against him ( see Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568, 569). Despite having been afforded ample opportunity to avoid the entry of default judgment, plaintiff's failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for their default or a meritorious defense to the counterclaims asserted by defendants ( see Granibras Granitos Brasileiros, Ltda. v Farber, 34 AD3d 230).

Under the circumstances, this appeal is frivolous. Sanctions should be imposed, and the responding defendants should be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses and attorney fees incurred on this appeal ( see Tsabbar v Auld, 26 AD3d 233).

We have considered plaintiff's' remaining arguments and find them without merit.


Summaries of

Melnick v. Khoroushi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 30, 2008
57 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Melnick v. Khoroushi

Case Details

Full title:STUART L. MELNICK et al., Appellants, v. FRED KHOROUSHI et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
869 N.Y.S.2d 500

Citing Cases

TWU Counseling Ctr. v. The N.Y.C. Tax Commn.

Nevertheless, we do not find that respondents' failure to respond was "part of a pattern of persistent and…

TWU Counseling Ctr. Inc. v. N.Y.C. Tax Comm'n

Nevertheless, we do not find that respondents’ failure to respond was "part of a pattern of persistent and…