From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mejia-Ortiz v. Inoa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 16, 2010
71 A.D.3d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2384.

March 16, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), entered September 30, 2009, which denied plaintiffs CPLR 3215 motion for a default judgment as against defendant Santos Brown-Grey and dismissed the complaint with prejudice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Calcagno Associates, Staten Island (Craig A. Borgen of counsel), for appellant.

Barnett Walter, LLP, Garden City (Jay M. Weinstein of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Friedman, J.P., Catterson, McGuire, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.


Plaintiff failed to take proceedings for the entry of judgment within one year after the default. Defendant Brown-Grey was purportedly served with the summons and complaint via the Secretary of State on January 23, 2007 ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 253). Accordingly, defendant's last day to answer was February 22, 2007 ( see CPLR 3012 [c]) and the default occurred the following day, February 23, 2007. Plaintiff moved for a default judgment against defendant Brown-Grey by notice of motion dated July 13, 2009. Thus, by moving almost 2½ years after the default, plaintiff failed to take proceedings for the entry of judgment within one year after the default ( see Butindaro v Grinberg, 57 AD3d 932, 932-933; Kay Waterproofing Corp. v Ray Realty Fulton, Inc., 23 AD3d 624, 625; Skeete v Bell, 292 AD2d 371).

We find that the motion court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in finding that plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his delay ( see Opia v Chukwu, 278 AD2d 394). Counsel's explanation for the delay in moving for the default is that his office staff failed to track the case properly. In addition, there was no submission of a personal affidavit of merit or verification of the complaint by plaintiff ( see CPLR 3215 [f]; Beltre v Babu, 32 AD3d 722; Feffer v Malpeso, 210 AD2d 60).


Summaries of

Mejia-Ortiz v. Inoa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 16, 2010
71 A.D.3d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Mejia-Ortiz v. Inoa

Case Details

Full title:RAMON MEJIA-ORTIZ, Appellant, v. GAVIN R. INOA et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 16, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 2025
895 N.Y.S.2d 816

Citing Cases

McIntosh v. 7 Lawrence St. Inc.

Plaintiff's other allegations regarding the corporate defendant's negligent training and supervision are only…

Wells Fargo Bank v. Vittoris

Accordingly, denial of the motion and dismissal of the complaint as abandoned is mandated. ( CPLR 3215[c] ;…