Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc.

Full title: EMELINA MEJER-KONDLA, APPELLANT, vs. DOUGLAS CENTRE, INC. AND EAGLETON…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 12, 1997

701 So. 2d 126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-364.

Opinion filed November 12, 1997.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Paul Siegel, Judge.

Garcia, Martinez Dominguez, and Carlos Garcia, and Humberto R. Dominquez, and Eve A. Boutsis, for appellant.

Richard A. Sherman, and Rosemary B. Wilder (Fort Lauderdale); Pedisich Wilensky, and Michael K. Wilensky (Fort Lauderdale); Robert A. Glassman, and David J. Ventura (Fort Lauderdale), for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN, and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Emelina Mejer-Kondla, appeals an order compelling settlement with appellees, Douglas Centre, Inc. and Eagleton Kathe Property, Co. We reverse, because the trial court improperly found a settlement agreement when there remained material differences regarding the essential elements of the proposed agreement. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 1985); Metropolitan Dade County v. Estate of Hernandez, 591 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Theolces v. Lytras, 518 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Gaines v. Nortrust Realty Management, Inc., 422 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.