From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meineke v. Finnan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Jan 3, 2013
No. 1:11-cv-01624-TWP-DKL (S.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cv-01624-TWP-DKL

01-03-2013

ANTHONY R. MEINEKE, Plaintiff, v. ALAN FINNAN Former Superintendent, JACK BINION Facility Head/Designee, CHARLES A. PENFOLD Final Reviewing Authority, sued in their individual and official capacities, CHARLES FOX Disciplinary Hearing Board Chairman, BRUCE LEMMON sued in his official capacity, KEITH BUTTS Superintendent, Defendants.


Order Denying Motion to Strike Amended Answer

The motion to strike the amended answer filed by the State defendants on December 15, 2012, has been considered. Although the thrust of the motion to strike is legitimate, the motion to strike [Dkt. 36] is denied. The plaintiff may explore the factual bases for the affirmative defenses through what is known as "contention interrogatories."

"[C]ontention interrogatories" refers to several types of questions. They may ask another party to indicate what it contends, to state all the facts on which it bases its contentions, to state all the evidence on which it bases its contentions, or to explain how the law applies to the facts. They are distinct from interrogatories that request identification of witnesses or documents that bear on the allegations.
McCarthy v. Paine Webber Group, Inc., 168 F.R.D. 448, 450 (D.Conn. 1996) (citing In re Convergent Technologies Securities Lit., 108 F.R.D. 328, 332-333 (N.D.Ca. 1985)); see also R. Braun Medical, Inc. V. Abbott Laboratories, 155 F.R.D. 525, 527 (E.D.Pa. 1994) (defining contention discovery as, inter alia, that which asks a party to "state all the facts upon which it bases a contention"); Leotta v. Firestone Tire and Rubber, 1989 WL 51797, at *2-3 (E.D.Pa. May 12, 1989)(explaining "contention interrogatories" embrace questions asking whether a party makes some specified contention, or asking a party to state all the facts or evidence on which it bases some specified contention).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana
Distribution: Anthony R. Meineke
147748
Pendleton Correctional Facility
Inmate Mail/Parcels
4490 West Reformatory Road
Pendleton, IN 46064
Electronically Registered Counsel


Summaries of

Meineke v. Finnan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Jan 3, 2013
No. 1:11-cv-01624-TWP-DKL (S.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Meineke v. Finnan

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY R. MEINEKE, Plaintiff, v. ALAN FINNAN Former Superintendent, JACK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Date published: Jan 3, 2013

Citations

No. 1:11-cv-01624-TWP-DKL (S.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2013)