From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MEEK v. MEEK

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Sep 16, 1960
338 S.W.2d 398 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

September 16, 1960.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Daviess County, Thomas J. Hennessy, J.

Claude E. Smith, Owensboro, for appellant.

Louise G. Kirtley, Owensboro, for appellee.


William R. Meek moved for modification of a judgment concerning the maintenance and custody of infant children. The trial judge made minor modifications but overruled the major portion of the motion. He appeals.

Upon examination of the record we find that the trial judge has not abused his discretion and we therefore decline to disturb his findings. Petrie v. Petrie, Ky., 262 S.W.2d 182; Wilkey v. Glisson, Ky., 303 S.W.2d 266.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

MEEK v. MEEK

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Sep 16, 1960
338 S.W.2d 398 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

MEEK v. MEEK

Case Details

Full title:William R. MEEK, Appellant, v. Margaret MEEK, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Sep 16, 1960

Citations

338 S.W.2d 398 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960)

Citing Cases

Spurlin v. Spurlin

"The trial court is vested with broad discretion in matters of this kind (alimony, maintenance, custody and…

Somerville v. Somerville

The trial court is vested with broad discretion in matters of this kind and this Court will not interfere…