From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MEDICINE SHOPPE INTERNATIONAL v. CKI PHARMACEUTICALS

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Apr 28, 2010
Case No. 4:10-CV-221 (CEJ) (E.D. Mo. Apr. 28, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 4:10-CV-221 (CEJ).

April 28, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion for default judgment, pursuant to Rule 55(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., against defendants CKI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Marcel U. Ilo.

Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 9, to confirm an arbitration award entered in its favor against defendants. On May 5, 1996, plaintiff Medicine Shoppe International, Inc., granted defendant CKI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a license to operate a pharmacy for a term of 20 years; defendant Marcel Ilo executed an Owner's Guaranty and Assumption of Licensee's Obligations. On March 30, 2007, plaintiff filed a claim for arbitration before the American Arbitration Association, seeking unpaid license fees and lost future revenue. An arbitration proceeding was scheduled for January 21, 2010. Defendants failed to appear after receiving notice. On January 28, 2010, the arbitrator entered an award in favor of plaintiff, holding defendants jointly and severally liable for $32,419.21 for past due license fees; $412,561.00 for the present value of lost future revenue; $107,477.18 for attorney's fees and costs; $714.76 for costs incurred as a result of continuances; and $11,547.50 for the costs of arbitration, for a total of $564,719.65.

The summons and a copy of the complaint were served on defendants on February 18, 2010. Defendants did not file an answer or other responsive pleading and, on March 17, 2010, the Clerk of Court entered default against defendants.

Discussion

A district court affords an arbitrator's decisions "an extraordinary level of deference" and confirms "so long as the arbitrator is even arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority." Stark v. Sandberg, Phoenix von Gontard, P.C., 381 F.3d 793, 798 (8th Cir. 2004). Courts have absolutely no authority to reconsider the merits of an arbitration award, even when the parties allege the award rests on factual errors or on a misinterpretation of the underlying contract. McGrann v. First Albany Corp., 424 F.3d 743, 748 (8th Cir. 2005). The bottom line is "[w]e will confirm the arbitrator's award even if we are convinced that the arbitrator committed serious error, so long as the arbitrator is even arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority." Id. (quoting Schoch v. InfoUSA, Inc., 341 F.3d 785, 788 (8th Cir. 2003)). The uncontested allegations in plaintiff's complaint are admitted by virtue of defendants' default and plaintiff has established that it is entitled to confirmation of the arbitrator's award.

Plaintiff also seeks an award of attorneys' fees and costs incurred in bringing this action. The License Agreement entered into between the parties provides for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees to "[t]he party prevailing in a judicial . . . proceeding" related to the enforcement of the obligations of the Agreement. Plaintiff submits the affidavit of attorney Benjamin A. Halpert. Mr. Halpert attests that his firm's standard hourly billing rate for his services was $345.00; the hourly rate for the services of partner Michael Godsby was $380.00; the hourly billing rate for the services of attorneys Grant Ankrom and Luke Maher was $185.00; and the hourly billing rate for the services of paralegal Joshua Paske was $195.00. Included with Mr. Halpert's affidavit is a billing record for work performed in connection with this case. The Court has reviewed the record and finds that the hours expended and the hourly rate charged are reasonable. Therefore, attorneys' fees in the amount of $3,346.00 will be awarded. In addition, costs in the amount of $350.00 for the filing fee and $316.00 for service of process will be awarded.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for default judgment [Doc. #11] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded $4,012.00 for attorney's fees and costs.

A separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order will be entered this date.


Summaries of

MEDICINE SHOPPE INTERNATIONAL v. CKI PHARMACEUTICALS

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Apr 28, 2010
Case No. 4:10-CV-221 (CEJ) (E.D. Mo. Apr. 28, 2010)
Case details for

MEDICINE SHOPPE INTERNATIONAL v. CKI PHARMACEUTICALS

Case Details

Full title:MEDICINE SHOPPE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Plaintiff, v. CKI PHARMACEUTICALS…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 28, 2010

Citations

Case No. 4:10-CV-221 (CEJ) (E.D. Mo. Apr. 28, 2010)

Citing Cases

Ladd v. Pickering

As aptly stated in Weitz Co., L.L.C. v. MacKenzie House, L.L.C., No. 07–0103–CV, 2010 WL 2292271, at *1 n. 1…