From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medical Health Services, Inc. v. Fountain Ctr.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1976
52 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

April 19, 1976


In an action upon instruments for the payment of sums of money only, commenced pursuant to CPLR 3213, defendant August J. Mirande (sued herein as Augusto Mirando) appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 12, 1975, as failed to grant his cross application for summary judgment. The said defendant also purports to appeal from an order of the same court, dated December 5, 1975, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, to strike the note of issue. Appeal from the order dated December 5, 1975, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No notice of appeal has been filed from such order. Order dated June 12, 1975 affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion, the dismissal of plaintiff's similar action against defendant in Special Term, New York County, for failure to appear for trial, was not on the merits and therefore is no bar to the within action (see CPLR 3216, subd [a], 5013; cf. Greenberg v De Hart, 4 N.Y.2d 511). Gulotta, P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Medical Health Services, Inc. v. Fountain Ctr.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1976
52 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Medical Health Services, Inc. v. Fountain Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:MEDICAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Respondent, v. FOUNTAIN CENTER CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
382 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

Persaud v. Goriah

Similarly, if a party fails to take steps to enter a judgment within one year of a default, "the court shall…

Matter of Commr. of Soc. Serv. v. Hargrove

The only issue on appeal is whether any of the prior dismissals were "on the merits" or "with prejudice". We…