From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medendorp v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jan 28, 2014
ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-687-Y (N.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2014)

Summary

finding because the ALJ rejected the only medical opinion in the record that he had analyzed that explained the effects of the claimant's impairments on her ability to perform work, there was no medical evidence supporting the ALJ's RFC determination

Summary of this case from Tyria R. v. Saul

Opinion

ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-687-Y

01-28-2014

DIANA MEDENDORP v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

On January 3, 2014, the United States magistrate judge issued his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the above-styled and numbered cause. The magistrate judge gave all parties until January 17 to serve and file with the Court written objections to his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation. No written objections have been received from either party. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996). As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation for error and has found none.

Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the magistrate judge's decision.

__________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Medendorp v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jan 28, 2014
ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-687-Y (N.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2014)

finding because the ALJ rejected the only medical opinion in the record that he had analyzed that explained the effects of the claimant's impairments on her ability to perform work, there was no medical evidence supporting the ALJ's RFC determination

Summary of this case from Tyria R. v. Saul

finding because the ALJ rejected the only medical opinion in the record that he had analyzed that explained the effects of the claimant's impairments on her ability to perform work, there was no medical evidence supporting the ALJ's RFC determination

Summary of this case from Jim S. v. Saul

finding because the ALJ rejected the only medical opinion in the record that he had analyzed that explained the effects of the claimant's impairments on her ability to perform work, there was no medical evidence supporting the ALJ's RFC determination

Summary of this case from Darrion B. v. Berryhill

finding because the ALJ rejected the only medical opinion in the record that he had analyzed that explained the effects of the claimant's impairments on her ability to perform work, there was no medical evidence supporting the ALJ's RFC determination

Summary of this case from Erica W. v. Berryhill

finding because the ALJ rejected the only medical opinion in the record that he had analyzed that explained the effects of the claimant's impairments on her ability to perform work, there was no medical evidence supporting the ALJ's RFC determination

Summary of this case from Angela C. v. Berryhill
Case details for

Medendorp v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:DIANA MEDENDORP v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Jan 28, 2014

Citations

ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-687-Y (N.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2014)

Citing Cases

Erica W. v. Berryhill

Consequently, substantial evidence does not support the mental aspect of the ALJ's RFC determination. See…

Tyria R. v. Saul

Consequently, substantial evidence does not support the ALJ's RFC determination. See Geason v. Colvin, No.…