From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mechanics Nat. Bank of Burlington Cty. v. Brady

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 6, 1972
296 A.2d 68 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Argued October 11, 1972 —

Decided November 6, 1972.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. William F. Tompkins argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Lum, Biunno Tompkins, attorneys; Mr. Walter J. Fessler, on the brief).

Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent, James C. Brady, Jr. ( Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Charles L. Terribile, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Mr. Edward Suski, Jr. argued the cause for respondent, Fidelity Bank and Trust Company ( Messrs. Wilinski, Coruzzi Suski, attorneys).


The judgment of the Appellate Division, 121 N.J. Super. 62, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judge CONFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Mechanics Nat. Bank of Burlington Cty. v. Brady

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 6, 1972
296 A.2d 68 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

Mechanics Nat. Bank of Burlington Cty. v. Brady

Case Details

Full title:MECHANICS NATIONAL BANK OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, A NATIONAL BANKING…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 6, 1972

Citations

296 A.2d 68 (N.J. 1972)
296 A.2d 68

Citing Cases

In re Kallen

90 N.J. at 90. Seealso Kelly v. Sterr, 62 N.J. 105, cert. denied, 414 U.S. 822, 94 S.Ct. 122, 38 L.Ed.2d 55…