From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mearin v. Vidonish

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-597 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-597.

December 29, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of dec, 2009, after the Plaintiff, Thurman Mearin, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Partial Motion to Dismiss by defendants, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until December 7, 2009, to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's partial motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. It is be granted with respect to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claim of being placed in Administrative Custody. It is denied as to Plaintiff's First Amendment claim of retaliation.


Summaries of

Mearin v. Vidonish

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-597 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Mearin v. Vidonish

Case Details

Full title:THURMAN MEARIN, Plaintiff v. PETE VIDONISH, Unit Manager; SUPERINTENDENT…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 29, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-597 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Prater v. Wetzel

of time less than three years in administrative custody do not impose undue hardship absent other conditions…