Opinion
Argued February 4, 1891
Decided February 24, 1891
Homer Weston for appellant.
Clark Brown for respondent.
RUGER, Ch. J., reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Meagley v. Hoyt
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1891
26 N.E. 719 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Meagley v. Hoyt
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1891
26 N.E. 719 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Meagley v. Hoyt
Case Details
Full title:JULIA LA VERNIA MEAGLEY, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v . JOEL S. HOYT…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 24, 1891
Citations
26 N.E. 719 (N.Y. 1891)
26 N.E. 719
36 N.Y. St. Rptr. 27
Citing Cases
Rommeney v. City of New York
The vice of this charge consists in defining the burden of proof as limited to a theory acceptable, probable…
People ex Rel. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. P.S. Comm"It is an invariable rule that the burden of proof lies upon the plaintiff to establish his cause of action,…