From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meadows v. Dalton

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 6, 1980
266 S.E.2d 235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

59036.

ARGUED JANUARY 15, 1980.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 6, 1980. REHEARING DENIED FEBRUARY 22, 1980.

Motion to set aside. Gwinnett Superior Court. Before Judge Pittard.

Glenn H. Strother, Clifton S. Fuller, Jr., for appellant.

Richard C. Freeman, III, for appellees.


This appeal is from an order denying plaintiff's motion to set aside an earlier judgment which had dismissed his complaint with prejudice and had granted summary judgment in favor of defendant upon a counterclaim. The basis of the court's earlier judgment was the plaintiff's failure to file timely responses to defendant's interrogatories, request for admissions, and request for production of documents. Plaintiff complains that the judgment should have been set aside because the defendant's attempts at discovery were neither made a part of the pleadings nor introduced in evidence. Held:

1. Plaintiff directed in his notice of appeal that the pleadings and the transcript be omitted from the record on appeal. "In such a case we assume that the evidence presented was sufficient to sustain the judgment, and the judgment must be affirmed." Turnquest v. Thompson, 146 Ga. App. 456 ( 246 S.E.2d 465) (1978).

2. In an additional enumeration of error, plaintiff contends that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion when it denied his motion to withdraw admissions, which was made contemporaneously with his motion to set aside. This enumeration of error is also without merit. Plaintiff not only failed to file timely responses to the requests, he failed to make a timely motion to withdraw these admissions. "This `withdrawal' of admissions upon a proper showing is a ... remedy allowed to defaulting requestees. That, however, puts the burden on the one who has failed to answer ... to be bound by the `admissions,' unless he takes the initiative and files a motion and succeeds in defeating such admissions. [Cits.]" Nat. Bank of Ga. v. Merritt, 130 Ga. App. 85, 87 ( 202 S.E.2d 193) (1973). The motion in this case, made after grant of summary judgment for the defendant, was not timely; and the record contains no defect which would support the grant of a motion to set aside.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.


ARGUED JANUARY 15, 1980 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 6, 1980 — REHEARING DENIED FEBRUARY 22, 1980.


Summaries of

Meadows v. Dalton

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 6, 1980
266 S.E.2d 235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Meadows v. Dalton

Case Details

Full title:MEADOWS v. DALTON et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 6, 1980

Citations

266 S.E.2d 235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
266 S.E.2d 235

Citing Cases

Hanson v. Farmer

]'" Drummond v. Brown, 149 Ga. App. 248 (1) ( 253 S.E.2d 868). Such a motion must be field timely in order to…

Brooks v. Multibank 2009-1 RES-ADC Venture, LLC

OCGA § 9–11–36(b). However, “[t]he motion in this case, made after grant of summary judgment for the…