In Sturm v Kelly, 120 Mich. 685; 79 N.W. 930 (1899), the Bay County drain commissioner petitioned for location and establishment of a drain.
Summary of this case from Toth v. Waterford TownshipNovember, 1925.
Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.
In Sturm v Kelly, 120 Mich. 685; 79 N.W. 930 (1899), the Bay County drain commissioner petitioned for location and establishment of a drain.
Summary of this case from Toth v. Waterford TownshipFull title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. M.E. STURM, Respondent, v…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1925
There is no proof as to whether these drains have been abandoned, but the return of the commissioner fairly…
Toth v. Waterford TownshipHe ordered that necessary steps be taken to prevent additional rutting or erosion of land between the drain…