From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McRae v. Spearman

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 25, 1933
148 So. 913 (Ala. 1933)

Opinion

6 Div. 48.

March 30, 1933. Rehearing Denied May 25, 1933.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; R. L. Blanton, Judge.

Travis Williams, of Russellville, and C. E. Mitchell, of Hamilton, for appellant.

Ernest Fite and K. V. Fite, both of Hamilton, for appellee.


Bill by the appellant, filed on August 29, 1929, to foreclose a mortgage executed by the respondent W. L. Spearman and his wife to L. G. Robinson on January 11, 1912, to secure an indebtedness of $300, due and payable on November 15, 1912. The mortgage was taken over by the complainant in December, 1914.

The defense asserted by the answer of Spearman is that the debt secured by the mortgage was paid before the filing of the bill.

On final hearing on the pleadings and proof, the circuit court ascertained that the mortgage debt was paid before the bill was filed, and dismissed the bill.

After a painstaking examination of the evidence in the case, we are not able to affirm that the conclusion of the circuit court is not fully sustained by the proof.

When the mortgage was taken over by complainant, the debt secured thereby was embraced as an item on a running account, and the payments thereafter were more than sufficient to discharge the mortgage debt. The principles applicable are stated in Mayer Bros. v. Gewin et al., 200 Ala. 391, 76 So. 307.

A discussion of the evidence would serve no good purpose. The decree is due to be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McRae v. Spearman

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 25, 1933
148 So. 913 (Ala. 1933)
Case details for

McRae v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:J. D. McRAE v. W. L. SPEARMAN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 25, 1933

Citations

148 So. 913 (Ala. 1933)
148 So. 913

Citing Cases

Moorer v. Tensaw Land Timber Co.

It is the generally accepted rule that where neither the debtor nor the creditor makes specific application…

Mitchell v. Bottoms

Winston v. Farrow (Ala.Sup.) 40 So. 53; Golden v. Conner, 89 Ala. 598, 8 So. 148; Redd Bros. v. Todd, 209…