From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McQueen v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 10, 2002
814 A.2d 1042 (N.J. 2002)

Opinion

A-61 September Term 2001

Argued: September 10, 2002

Decided: October 10, 2002

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 342 N.J. Super. 120 (2001).

Kenneth M. Goldman argued the cause for appellants (Douglas E. Gershuny, Executive Director, Cape-Atlantic Legal Services, Inc., attorney).

William A. Thompson, III, argued the cause for respondent (Callaghan Thompson Thompson, attorneys).

Melville D. Miller, Jr., President, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae, Legal Services of New Jersey (Mr. Miller, attorney; Mr. Miller and Joseph Harris Davis, on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Eichen's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 342 N.J. Super. 120 (2001).

CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and JUDGE PRESSLER (temporarily assigned) join in this opinion.


Summaries of

McQueen v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 10, 2002
814 A.2d 1042 (N.J. 2002)
Case details for

McQueen v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA MCQUEEN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES BROWN and STEVEN COOK…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 10, 2002

Citations

814 A.2d 1042 (N.J. 2002)
814 A.2d 1042

Citing Cases

Township of Pemberton v. Berardi

(citing State v. Wright, 107 N.J. 488, 495, 527 A.2d 379 (1987)). See also, McQueen v. Brown, 342 N.J.Super.…

Nally v. Shyshka

So long as an owner of property with one or two rental units can demonstrate he or she is a bona fide owner…