From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNulty Brothers v. Offerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1914
164 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

October, 1914.


On this third appeal (See 141 App. Div. 730; 152 id. 181) the record on examination shows that the decree in favor of the two lienors, Cross, Austin Ireland Lumber Company and Robert T. McMurray Brother, is well supported and justified by the evidence. Although each lienor has taken a cross-appeal, we are satisfied of the correctness of the several deductions made at the Special Term. The allowance, however, to the George Weiderman Electric Company should be modified. After the written refusal of Mr. Offerman to bear any of the expense for electric wiring the lessee, for his own purposes, contracted for ninety-nine brackets or outlets under the new steel balcony. There was no authority or consent by the owners for this outlay. Nor may the charge be sustained as implied in the construction of the balcony itself, of which it forms no part. The item of $875 must, therefore, be stricken out, reducing this lienor's recovery to $1,123.16. We find no ground to require the allowance of interest or to interfere with the discretion exercised in granting costs to the lienors. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, modified by reducing the recovery of the George Weiderman Electric Company to $1,123.16, as of the date of the Special Term decree (and otherwise the amounts found are confirmed.) As so modified the judgment is affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Jenks, P.J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment modified by reducing the recovery of the George Weiderman Electric Company to $1,123.16, as of the date of the Special Term decree (and otherwise the amounts found are confirmed). As so modified the judgment is affirmed, without costs of this appeal.


Summaries of

McNulty Brothers v. Offerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1914
164 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

McNulty Brothers v. Offerman

Case Details

Full title:McNULTY BROTHERS, Plaintiff, v . CARSTEN HENRY OFFERMAN and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1914

Citations

164 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Citing Cases

Marsh v. Thomson Realty Corporation

( De Klyn v. Gould, 165 N.Y. 282, 287.) It was held in McNulty Bros. v. Offerman ( 164 App. Div. 949) that…