From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNitt v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 25, 1965
24 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

June 25, 1965

Appeal from the Court of Claims.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman and Henry, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts, by reducing the amount to $3,575, and interest, and as so modified judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent. Memorandum: The Court of Claims Judge awarded $2,000 for consequential damage, and $3,500 for direct damage. The amount awarded for consequential damage was within the range of the testimony of the experts and should be affirmed. However, as to the award of $3,500 for direct damage, this was $1,925 higher than the testimony most favorable to claimant. In other words, there is no basis in the record for an award in that amount. Nor can a view of the property act as a substitute for testimony. ( Matter of City of New York [ A. W. Realty Corp.], 1 N.Y.2d 428, 433; George's Bake Shop v. State of New York, 21 A.D.2d 423, 424, 425.) This part of the award should be reduced to $1,575, making the total amount $3,575, and interest.


Summaries of

McNitt v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 25, 1965
24 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

McNitt v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. McNITT, Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Zeitlin v. State

Such damages were found by the State's appraiser, although they were not denominated as such, in his estimate…

Wayside Nurseries v. State of N.Y

Claimant's appraiser computed direct damages at $23,616 while the State's appraiser fixed them at $7,450. The…