refusing to apply reasonable expectations principle where insured was larger than insurer because principle was founded on presumption of disparate bargaining power
Summary of this case from Vargas v. Calabrese86-5751.
Filed: September 15, 1987.
D.N.J., Barry, J., 645 F.Supp. 525.
AFFIRMED.
refusing to apply reasonable expectations principle where insured was larger than insurer because principle was founded on presumption of disparate bargaining power
Summary of this case from Vargas v. CalabreseFull title:McNeilab Inc., Appeal of McNeilab Inc. v. North River Ins. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Sep 15, 1987
E.g., Killeen Trucking, Inc. v. Great Am. Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 211 N.J. Super. 712, 512 A.2d 590 (App.Div.…
United Technologies v. American Home Assur.AH argues that "real property" is ambiguous because the Policies' premiums were not adjusted to reflect the…