From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMann v. Ross

U.S.
Dec 8, 1969
396 U.S. 118 (1969)

Summary

remanding the case to the district court with direction to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus as moot due to the death of the respondent/petitioner

Summary of this case from Mohamed v. Lackner

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

No. 153.

Decided December 8, 1969

409 F.2d 1016, vacated and remanded as to respondent Ross.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lillian Z. Cohen and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.

Thomas D. Barr for respondent Ross.

Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for the District Attorney of New York County as amicus curiae urging reversal.


Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness by reason of the death of respondent Ross the judgment of the Court of Appeals, as to Ross, is vacated and the case as to him is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus as moot.


Summaries of

McMann v. Ross

U.S.
Dec 8, 1969
396 U.S. 118 (1969)

remanding the case to the district court with direction to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus as moot due to the death of the respondent/petitioner

Summary of this case from Mohamed v. Lackner
Case details for

McMann v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:McMANN, WARDEN, ET AL. v . ROSS ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 8, 1969

Citations

396 U.S. 118 (1969)
90 S. Ct. 395

Citing Cases

United States ex Rel. Brock v. LaVallee

Moreover, this claim also is not properly before the court, for although it appears to have been presented to…

United States ex Rel. Comacho v. Follette

A variety of claims were raised in Comacho's habeas corpus application to the district court; but it is…