McLaughlin v. Hahne Co.

Full title: PETER McLAUGHLIN, RESPONDENT, v. HAHNE COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 4, 1934

172 A. 566 (N.J. 1934)

172 A. 566

Opinion

Submitted February 16, 1934 —

Decided May 4, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 12 N.J. Mis. R. 6.

For the appellant, Cohen Kline.

For the respondent, Herman M. Wilson.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.