From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McInnes v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

February, 1929.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O'Malley, JJ.


Order modified by permitting an X-ray photograph to be taken in conjunction with a physical examination of the plaintiff, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. This privilege, however, should not be abused, and should be limited to a time and place convenient to the plaintiff and by a physician designated by the court. ( Hollister v. Robertson, 208 App. Div. 449.) Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

McInnes v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

McInnes v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER A. McINNES, Appellant, v. WILLIAM M. CANNON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1929

Citations

225 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Pure Oil Co.

To do otherwise would be stepping backward. The decisions of the New York state courts seem to be in accord…

Greenhow v. Whitehead's, Inc.

The trial court abused its discretion in failing to order the physical examination of plaintiff to be…