From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIlrath v. City of Kingman

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
May 9, 2014
324 P.3d 343 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

holding that, without more, allegations that defendants caused "physical and emotional damage and caused [plaintiffs] to be extremely anxious, fearful, extremely agitated, extremely upset, and extremely fearful," were insufficient to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress

Summary of this case from Balmer Fund, Inc. v. City of Harper

Opinion

No. 109,837.

2014-05-9

Clinton McILRATH and Serena McIlrath, Appellants, v. CITY OF KINGMAN, KANSAS, et al., Appellees.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

McIlrath v. City of Kingman

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
May 9, 2014
324 P.3d 343 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014)

holding that, without more, allegations that defendants caused "physical and emotional damage and caused [plaintiffs] to be extremely anxious, fearful, extremely agitated, extremely upset, and extremely fearful," were insufficient to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress

Summary of this case from Balmer Fund, Inc. v. City of Harper
Case details for

McIlrath v. City of Kingman

Case Details

Full title:Clinton McILRATH and Serena McIlrath, Appellants, v. CITY OF KINGMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: May 9, 2014

Citations

324 P.3d 343 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Molina v. Blevins

Thus, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for the tort of outrage. McIlrath v. City of Kingman, Kan., 2014 WL…

Ledbetter v. Blevins

Thus, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for the tort of outrage. McIlrath v. City of Kingman, Kan., 2014 WL…