From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 27, 2000
19 N.J. Tax 114 (Tax 2000)

Opinion

Argued March 20, 2000

Decided June 27, 2000

On appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey, Essex County.

Before Judges A.A. RODRIGUEZ and COLLESTER.

Susan A. Feeney argued the cause for appellant ( McCarter English, attorneys; Ms. Feeney, of counsel and on the briefs).

Matthew J. Scola argued the cause for respondent.


MCI Telecommunications Corp. (MCI), appeals from the Tax Court's determination that the "highest and best use" of its property at 271 Mt. Pleasant Avenue, West Orange, is "a special purpose telecommunication facility." MCI had challenged the valuation of the property for the years 1995 and 1996. The matter was tried by Judge Roger M. Kahn.

On appeal, MCI contends that Judge Kahn erred: (1) by concluding that highest and best use of the property was that of a special purpose telecommunication facility; (2) by failing to consider MCI's expert's evaluation approach; and (3) by failing to consider functional obsolescence in applying the cost approach.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Kahn in his October 27, 1998 written opinion.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 27, 2000
19 N.J. Tax 114 (Tax 2000)
Case details for

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE

Case Details

Full title:MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jun 27, 2000

Citations

19 N.J. Tax 114 (Tax 2000)

Citing Cases

Westwood Lanes, Inc. v. Borough

New Jersey courts recognize as a reliable calculator of a property's market value both the replacement cost…

Regent Care v. Hackensack City

The age-life method is a reliable estimate of depreciation and obsolescence when using the cost approach of…