Summary
holding that a contract was fully integrated where it stated that it contained the parties' entire understanding, was not ambiguous, covered the disputed subject matter, and “convey[ed] no suggestion that anything beyond the four corners of the writing [was] necessary in order to ascertain the intent of the parties”
Summary of this case from Silvis v. Ambit Energy L.P.Opinion
Argued September 27, 1988.
Decided October 20, 1988.
Appeal No. 31 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1988 from Order of Superior Court, 368 Pa. Super. 344, 534 A.2d 115 (1987) entered November 23, 1987, at No. 1646 Pittsburgh 1986, Reversing and Remanding Order of Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Civil Division, entered October 29, 1986, at No. GD 81-22542.
Geoffrey P. Wozman, Martin E. Goldhaber, Mary C. Fairley, Pittsburgh, for appellant.
Samuel Y. Stroh, Pittsburgh, Raymond H. Bogaty, Grove City, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and STOUT, JJ.
ORDER
Order affirmed.